Microeconomics vs. Macroeconomics - Which Class Should I Take First?

Submitted By:
Posting Date:

Type

Study advice

Type

Study advice


When you're just beginning your studies in economics, you'll come across two very important subjects – microeconomics and macroeconomics. It's highly likely that you'll study both of these topics as you learn more about economics, as they are foundational to the subject. However, you might be in the position where you have to choose a class in economics to study now, before specialising later on – and in that case, should you take a class in microeconomics or macroeconomics first? Which will give you the best starting point for your studies in economics? We're going to discuss this question today, so you can learn a little about each subject and decide which you should study first.

 What are the definitions of microeconomics and macroeconomics?

Before making any decisions about which classes to take, you need to understand what each subject refers to. Microeconomics is the study of economic systems on a small scale – meaning that it is about the way which economic theories play out when they are applied to an individual, a group, or a company. For example, microeconomics in practice would include the study of supply and demand for a particular product or service, or examination of how a particular piece of legislation would effect a business who operated in that area.

Macroeconomics, on the other hand, looks at the entire economy of countries or of the world. It examines economics on the larger scale, seeing how economic theories apply to governments and international organisations such as NATO. Examples of the kind of topics studied in macroeconomics would include the gross domestic product of a country, or the economics of imports to and exports from a country.

The differences between microeconomics and macroeconomics

So then, how are these subjects different? They both deal with similar issues, but on different levels. In fact, the same topics of study can be relevant to both subjects. For example, consider the issue of cost of living in a particular area, and its relation to inflation. This is related to microeconomics – because it's about how much people have to spend on housing, food, entertainment and so on – and can therefore be described on the individual level. But it's also an important topic in macroeconomics, as the inflation rate is effected by things like the interest rate which is set by the state. So it can also be described on the national level, as a subject of macroeconomics.

The relevance of microeconomics and macroeconomics to economics in general

You can see that these two subjects are often interconnected, where investigating one facet of a topic shows how the same topic can also be studied on a different level. One rough way of thinking about this is that microeconomics is “bottom up”, looking at how individual choices effect economic systems, while macroeconomics is “top down”, looking at how economic systems effect the people living within them.

In order to understand a complex economic issue such as how and when a state should adjust the inflation rate, you would need to understand the basic principles of supply and demand and the way in which people make economic decisions, which would be microeconomics. Then you would need to understand how these principles apply to monetary systems and the financial market, and how the economy of a country fits into the international economic system, which would be macroeconomics.

Should you take microeconomics or macroeconomics first?

This means that for most economics students, you are better off starting with studying microeconomics first, and then progressing on to macroeconomics. That way, you can learn the principles of economics on an individual level, before you try to understand how those principles apply on a higher level.  

However, some would argue that you can understand the principles of economics better if you see them in practice first – as in, first you must study the financial system in order to make any sense of economics as a topic. These people would argue that it can be helpful to study macroeconomics before microeconomics.

You might even find that your university roles both subjects into one unit such as an Introduction to Economics course. Any of these options will allow you to learn what you need to progress in your economics studies, but in general, most students will opt to begin with studying microeconomics first.


These articles may be also interesting to you:

>> Top Economics Think Tanks and Research Institutes in the US

>> Top Economics Think Tanks and Research Institutes in Europe

>> Top 10 Economics Journals

>> Top Finance Podcasts

>> Top Economics Podcasts

>> 30 Top Twitter Feeds in Economics and Finance

>> What to Do With Your Economics Degree: Career Paths for An Economist