Income Elasticity of Demand

Income elasticity of demand  YED_A  is a measure of how the quantity demanded of an item A  q _A   in a market is affected by a change in income  Y  on the demand side of the market:

In the market for any good or service, how much of it is demanded depends to a large extent on its affordability to buyers.  An item’s affordability is determined both by the price at which it is offered and by the buyers’ available budgets.  While price elasticity of demand gauges the sensitivity of buyers to changes in the item’s price, income elasticity of demand considers the relationship between budgets and quantity demanded.

The concept of income elasticity is used to classify goods and services into two main types: normal and inferior.  A normal good or service is one whose demand moves in the same direction as income. That is, if the buyer’s income increases (falls) then the buyer will demand more (less) of the product.  In this case, YED_A > 0.  On the other hand, an inferior good or service is one whose demand moves in the opposite direction to income, YED_A < 0.

Examples of normal items include consumer goods and services such as clothes, electronic goods, general transport services and theatre and concert tickets. Consumers generally want more as they become better off. Normal goods and services can be subdivided further into the categories of basic necessities and luxury items. Basic necessities are items whose income elasticity of demand is inelastic, 0 < YED_A < 1.  That is, demand does respond positively but it does not rise or fall by as much as income in response to any change in income.  As its name suggests, demand for a basic necessity is less sensitive to a change in income: the buyer needs it!  In contrast, a luxury item is one whose demand increases as soon as it becomes affordable; its income elasticity of demand is said to be elastic, YED_A > 1.

Inferior goods and services include food staples such as bread and shared transport such as public bus services.  When income rises and demand for an inferior good or service falls, its consumption is typically replaced by an alternative item with a higher income elasticity of demand.  For example, consumers may switch their income away from bread in order to consume more meat, or they may purchase a private car or other more comfortable form of transport to substitute for their public-bus journeys.
Income elasticity of demand is often described graphically using an Engel curve (named after the German statistician Ernst Engel). This is a plot of quantity demanded against income (not to be confused with a demand curve, which shows the relationship between prices and quantity demanded!).  In the graph below, the 45° dashed line through the origin represents proportionate responses of buyers to changes in income, i.e. unit income elasticity of demand, YED_A = 1. Along this line, if buyers’ income increases by 10% then their demand for the item also rises by 10%. The special cases of normal goods, necessity and luxury, are easily discernible in relation to this dashed line; inferior goods are recognisable by the negative relationship between income and quantity demanded.

Further reading

Aitchison and Brown provide further forms of Engel curves in their article, “A Synthesis of Engel Curve Theory” (The Review of Economic Studies, 1954) and point out that what constitutes a necessity for one income group in the economy may in fact represent a luxury for another income group.  Hence their thesis is that Engel curves should be curves rather than straight lines!

Good to know

Economists are often criticised for assuming that more is always better. This may be an unfair claim.  Economists tend to focus on the maximisation of individual utility (read: happiness!), which need not always rise with income and consumption. At some point, consumption is saturated. This is manifested through the large gifts and donations that the rich often make to others in the form of charity.  Income elasticity of demand is also very relevant in Development Economics; income elasticity tends to be higher at lower levels of economic development.